C-SPAN.org | Created by Cable. Offered as a Public Service.
  
 Advanced Search
Schedules Featured Topics C-SPAN Series C-SPAN Websites Resources
 
Live TV/Radio Live TV/Radio Video Library Video Library
TV Schedules Book TV Schedule
Radio Schedule C-SPAN Alert
111th Congress Health Care Response to Terrorism
Obama Administration Energy Politics
Supreme Court Iraq U.S. Economy
America & the Courts The Communicators Q&A
Booknotes Newsmakers Road to the White House
Book TV Prime Minister's Questions Washington Journal
C-SPAN Radio Specials
American Presidents C-SPAN's Civics Bus Q&A
American Writers Capitol Hearings StudentCam
Blair House Capitol Spotlight Students & Leaders
Booknotes Economic Stimulus Tocqueville
Book TV Lincoln 200 Years The Capitol
C-SPAN Classroom Lincoln Book The Supreme Court
C-SPAN Radio Politics The White House
C-SPAN Video Library Presidential Libraries
C-SPAN Podcasts Political News
C-SPAN Viewer's Guide Media Organizations
Congress/Legislative Blogs
White House/Executive Policy Organizations
Supreme Court/Judiciary Featured Links Archive
State/Local C-SPAN Special Pages
International
 

Articles on Cameras in the Court

  • Vanity Fair column by Andrew Cohen: "Could Supreme Court TV Make America Smarter?" (11/13/09)
  • Sen. Specter Introduces Resolution to Televise Supreme Court Proceedings (11/5/09)
  • USA Today op-ed by Tony Mauro: "On court, candor is in the air; What a difference one justice, and a TV camera, can make in opening up? the Supreme Court to the people it serves" (10/28/09)
  • Fort-Worth Star Telegram editorial: "U.K. Supreme Court's ahead of its American cousin"(10/23/09)
  • Boston Herald op-ed by Wayne Woodlief: "Televised justice would be for all" (8/7/09)
  • Arlen Specter op-ed: "Accept more cases, TV coverage" (8/3/09)
  • Law Litigation Daily: "Jonathan Sherman of Boies Schiller: Someday, There Will Be Cameras at the U.S. Supreme Court" (7/29/09)
  • Jacksonville Times-Union: "Supreme Court: Open it up" (7/24/09)
  • IndayStar.com: A Difficult Case for Cameras (7/27/09)
  • Minnesota AP News: "Panel Weighs Study On Impact Of Cameras In Courts" (7/24/09)
  • Staunton News Leader editorial: "Court Belongs on TV" (7/23/09)
  • Watertown Daily Times editorial: "Courtroom cameras: Sotomayor a voice in favor" (7/21/09)
  • USA Today article: "Sotomayor: Put high court on TV" (7/20/09)
  • Reno Gazette-Journal: "Editorial: Cameras in the Supreme Court would benefit justices, public" (7/20/09)
  • From Salisbury (MD) Daily Times: "Court cameras' time has come: Broadcasts of Supreme Court proceedings are inevitable" (7/16/09)
  • techPresident article: "Cameras in Court: Oyez or Oh No?" (7/15/09)
  • Hartford Courant editorial: "Let's See Supreme Justice – On TV" (7/13/09)
  • USA Today editorial: "Cameras in the court" (7/13/09)
  • Baton Rouge Advocate editorial: "Our View: Televise oral arguments" (7/13/09)
  • Toledo Blade editorial: "Camera-shy justice" (7/12/09)
  • Tulsa World column: "Will Sotomayor agree? Time for cameras in the nation's Supreme Court" (7/12/09)
  • Pittsburgh Post-Gazette editorial: "Camera-shy justice: The Supreme Court should be televised" (7/7/09)
  • TC Palm (Fort Pierce Florida) Editorial: "Open U.S. Supreme Court to TV coverage" (7/7/09)
  • Columbus Dispatch editorial: "Open to the public: U.S. Supreme Court should allow broadcast of oral arguments" (7/7/09)
  • Norfolk Virginian-Pilot editorial: "Roll the cameras at Supreme Court" (7/7/09)
  • Reading Eagle editorial: "It's time to bring Supreme Court into the 21st century" (7/7/09)
  • Massachusetts Metrowest Daily News Editorial: "Put Supreme Court on TV" (7/7/09)
  • Kenosha News Editorial: "It's time for cameras in Supreme Court" (7/6/09)
  • Minneapolis Star Tribune Editorial: "Courtroom cameras in a YouTube age" (7/5/09)
  • Portland Oregonian editorial: "Law and the lens" (7/4/09)
  • Houston Chronicle article: Texas on the Potomac: "Cornyn, Sotomayor could play roles in high court TV drama" (7/3/09)
  • Scripps Howard News Service Editorial: "It's time for TV cameras in Supreme Court" (7/3/09)
  • Tacoma News Tribune editorial: "U.S. Supreme Court: Not ready for prime time?" (7/1/09)
  • U.S. News & World Report: "Sotomayor Should Push for Cameras in the Courtroom" (6/12/09)
  • Los Angeles Times Op-ed: "Supreme Court TV" (6/11/09)
  • Washington Times: "Chances slim for cameras in Supreme Court." (6/9/09)
  • USA Today Op-ed: "Court, cameras, action!" (5/27/09)
  • National Law Journal: "The replacement rush" (5/11/09)
  • Politico, "New push to bring cameras in Supreme Court." (5/11/09)
  • Wall Street Journal: "No Consensus on Cameras In US Supreme Court - Thomas, Breyer." (4/23/09)

Resources

  • Cameras in the Court: Learn about the Justice's views on the issue of opening the Court to cameras, based on their public statements.
  • YouTube Playlist: C-SPAN programming with Supreme Court Justices giving their opinions on cameras in the court.
  • Timeline: C-SPAN Timeline on Cameras in the Court
  • Articles & Op-eds: Articles from nation-wide media outlets on cameras in the court.
  • C-SPAN Poll on The Supreme Court: Read a nationwide poll of voters: What Americans know about the Supreme Court and Judge Sotomayor's nomination.
  • C-SPAN's Supreme Court Page: Research video, correspondence, testimony and other resources.
  • C-SPAN's Supreme Court Documentary: Hear directly from most of the Supreme Court Justices themselves, and see the building in exquisite detail.
  • Senate Judiciary Committee: Research hearings, testimony and Senator's statements.
  • RTNDA Resources The Radio-Television News Directors Association (RTNDA) offers a state-by-state guide on the laws regarding cameras in the courtroom.
 
   
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Video Help
  • Employment
  • Copyright Policy
  • Podcasts
  • C-SPAN Products