The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Garland v. ... Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit sided with the plaintiffs, and the Biden administration appealed the decision to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case concerning whether a plaintiff whose state court lawsuit has been transferred by the defendants to the federal court can seek to have the case sent back to the state court by all references to federal law.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case on whether people under domestic violence protective orders can have guns, currently prohibited under federal law. In 2020 a Texas court issued a two-year order and revoked the gun license of Zackey Rahimi after his then-girlfriend requested it in response to a 2019 incident in which he allegedly threatened and pushed her inside a car, and fired his gun at a witness. ... The Court later ruled 8-1 that "when an individual has been found by a court* to pose a credible threat to the physical safety of another, that individual may be temporarily disarmed."
The Supreme Court considered whether the ATF has the authority to regulate bump stocks as it regulates machine guns, which are illegal and banned under federal law. ... The Court* later struck down the ban, 6-3.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in FDA v. ... This case dates to 2023 and was first heard in a Texas federal district court, where the judge halted the FDA's approval of the medication. ... This was the high court's first abortion access case since overturning Roe v. ... The Court* later unanimously upheld broad use of Mifepriston
Supreme Court in April and decided in July. On April 25th, the nation's highest court heard oral argument in Trump v. ... On July 1st, in a landmark decision and a first of its kind, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 former President Donald Trump, or any president does have immunity for core constitutional powers and official acts but not unofficial ones. ... With this ruling, the court did not rule on whether the alleged acts in the indictment were official or unofficial and threw it back down to the lower court for additional proceedings consistent with this landmark decision.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Trump v. ... The Court on July 1, 2024, ruled 6-3 that presidents have immunity for clearly official acts, but not unofficial acts. The justices sent the case back to the lower court* to establish whether acts alleged in Mr.
Supreme Court in April and decided in July. On April 25th, the nation's highest court heard oral argument in Trump v. ... On July 1st, in a landmark decision and a first of its kind, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 former President Donald Trump, or any president does have immunity for core constitutional powers and official acts but not unofficial ones. ... With this ruling, the court did not rule on whether the alleged acts in the indictment were official or unofficial and threw it back down to the lower court for additional proceedings consistent with this landmark decision.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Fischer v. ... The Court later ruled 6-3 to narrow the interpretation of the federal statute used to charge January 6 defendants with instructions. The Court*'s ruling could affect the cases of hundreds of defendants in the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S.
Bloomberg News Supreme Court reporter Greg Stohr previewed the oral argument in Fischer v. ... The Court later ruled 6-3 to narrow the interpretation of a federal statute used to charge January 6 defendants with obstruction. ... With this ruling, the case was sent back down to the lower federal court* for additional proceedings.
Associated Press Supreme Court reporter Mark Sherman previewed oral argument in United States v. ... Supreme Court in November 2023 and decided in June 2024. The question before the Court was whether people who are subject to a domestic violence protective order can be in possession of a gun. The Court later ruled 8-1 that "when an individual has been found by a court to pose a credible threat to the physical safety of another, that individual may be temporarily disarmed."
Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. ... This is an audio recording of the court's oral argument with still images of the participants shown as they spoke.
